Cognitive Load Theory: Extraneous Load in Physical Practical Work
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4; Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2014). Implications for instructional design. In The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 27–42).
Human working memory is biologically constrained to 4±1 novel information chunks (Cowan, 2001). When instructional materials force learners to divide attention between disparate sources (e.g. written lab sheets, equipment assemblies, and blackboard notes), extraneous cognitive load surges, starving working memory of resources needed for conceptual schema construction.
FIXSTEM eliminates the split-attention effect by integrating the physical apparatus instruction, safety checks, and live measurement logging into a single, unified, step-by-step visual stream aligned directly with the student's physical bench perspective.
General Cognitive Load Theory does not automatically guarantee that any digital interface reduces load. FIXSTEM's school pilot must explicitly measure subjective cognitive load (e.g., Paas 9-point mental effort scale) against traditional paper lab sheets.